3 ms·
The writer is not an entrepreneur (according to his bio), and didn't back his "analysis" with any form of data (beyond some anecdotal telltales) — yet his concl
by ahmedfromtunis 3y ago
The writer is not an entrepreneur (according to his bio), and didn't back his "analysis" with any form of data (beyond some anecdotal telltales) — yet his conclusion is stated without any sliver of doubt: "it *will* destroy your company"!
- sfink 3y agoI think the conclusion is justifiable, but it relies on the author's definition of "destroy". "If you want to run a company that looks like X, then taking VC money will prevent that from happening" is a pretty easy conclusion to make, though the only value in it is in the description of potentially surprising parts of what not-X looks like, to allow readers to judge whether they care.