> Nicklaus Wirth was right In what respect in this context? I should have explicitly stated that "Hello.dll" is a .NET assembly, i.e. Oberon+ uses the Mono CLR

> Nicklaus Wirth was right In what respect in this context? I should have explicitly stated that "Hello.dll" is a .NET assembly, i.e. Oberon+ uses the Mono CLR to run and debug the Oberon+ code (but not the .NET framework); it can also generate C99 (as a substitute for AOT compilation), but here it is about the minimal size of a Hello World .NET binary. WASM and especially the WAMR runtime might be a good alternative to the Mono CLR in future, but today it's too slow and only a few architectures are supported (much less than Mono).