3 ms·
Ad hominem attacks are boring, you can do better. Maybe challenge the methodology? Or the data sources? "NOAA Global METARs NOAA One-Minute Observations (OMO
by claytongulick 3y ago
Ad hominem attacks are boring, you can do better.
Maybe challenge the methodology?
Or the data sources?
"NOAA Global METARs NOAA One-Minute Observations (OMOs) NBDC Global Buoy Reports MADIS Mesonet Data"
Or should I ignore your comment because your HN handle is "itsanaccount"?
- thefurdrake 3y agoCan you please provide detail on how mentioning the existence interests of the source you provided is ad hominem? This is a new definition of ad hominem I don't think I've encountered before.