7 ms·
Except that more efficient solutions can be implemented much more practically? Solutions that you'd need to bend over backwards for in C?
by dermesser 3y ago
Except that more efficient solutions can be implemented much more practically? Solutions that you'd need to bend over backwards for in C?
- xyzzy_plugh 3y agoWhat does that have to do with efficiency? We don't appear to be debating language ergonomics, but the notion that C is somehow inferior to C++ when it comes to performance.