5 ms·
This is far more relevant and exciting This is way more exciting. https://twitter.com/MStrehovsky/status/1669502394827419648 https://twitter.com/MStrehovsky/sta
by ledgerdev 3y ago
This is far more relevant and exciting
This is way more exciting. https://twitter.com/MStrehovsky/status/1669502394827419648 https://twitter.com/MStrehovsky/status/1669502394827419648
> "A fully self-contained natively compiled C# Hello World, including GC and everything can be as small as ~440 kB."
.net classic framework is windows deprecated legacy, and really no new apps should be built on it.
- TravHatesMe 3y agoUnless you're building an app relying on office/COM apis
- pjmlp 3y agoOr a proper development experience for Windows Forms and WPF.
- kcb 3y agoWhat's different about the development experience. In Visual Studio it doesn't make much of a difference if you're target framework or .Net 5+.
- pjmlp 3y agoDesigner is still buggy, the new out of process model makes it incompatible with existing component libraries, requiring a rewrite. In many things, .NET Core/.NET 5+ is the Python 3 of .NET ecosystem.
- ComputerGuru 3y agoThe resulting exe doesn't really "use" the framework in any way, other than relying on an implementation detail of the backing ucrt.dll library exposed as an unmanaged pinvoke (c# ffi) call.