3 ms·

Here you go: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/08/elon-musk-taiwan-china-special-administrative-zone-hong-kong https://www.theguardian.com/technol

by sidibe 3y ago

Here you go: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/08/elon-musk-taiwan-china-special-administrative-zone-hong-kong https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/oct/08/elon-musk... Your examples are quite different from that. Buffet and Apple have profited/continue to profit off China but hope you don't notice, they aren't enthusiastically praising how much better it is than the US and saying things about Taiwan that the government wants. Especially seeing Google cited is funny since it was an exploratory project that got nixed when more of the company found about it, and they've been famously uncooperative with China.

onethought 3y ago
Right so you are judging words over action. Exactly my point. Google example, clearly Page and Brin knew, and thought it was ok. Just caved to company pressure. Apple don’t talk about it, but clearly think it. Musks suggestion (after being directly asked) on Taiwan was: a SER type setup more lenient than HK. I don’t agree with his assessment. But id hardly call it advocating, he is asked constantly every single interview. No one asks these other CEOs.