4 ms·
The initial AMD announcement included some comparisons, for example "AMD also included battery life benchmarks comparing the Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U against two Core
by kramerger 3y ago
The initial AMD announcement included some comparisons, for example
"AMD also included battery life benchmarks comparing the Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U against two Core i7 models and the Apple M2 Pro, with the former both having a battery capacity of 54 Wh, while the latter had a 69.6 Wh battery. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 Pro 7840U system was equipped with a 51.3 Wh battery yet managed to deliver longer battery life than all three competing laptops, with the highest delta being a 70% advantage over the Core i7-1370P"
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-intros-ryzen-7000-pro-mobile-and-desktop-chips-ai-comes-to-pro-series https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-intros-ryzen-7000-pro-...
- hospitalJail 3y ago"AMD says AMD is the best." Wow, I'm so surprised. I also think I am the best(/s). I still find this compute per watt thing such a silly thing for any company to care about. Until Apple did it, it was not on anyone's minds. Once Apple did it, they dumped a bunch of money into marketing a metric that no one cared about; and now people pretend to care about it. Not to mention this obsession with CPU that I just cannot grasp. Not sure what industries this is the bottleneck.
- dhruvdh 3y agoThe sheer audacity to claim no one cared about perf/watt before Apple. More like you did not know what it is before you consumed Apple marketing.
- heavyset_go 3y agoPoe's law strikes again. > Until Apple did it, it was not on anyone's minds. This is too on the nose.
- Macha 3y agoVR (sorry, "spatial computing" now, Apple doesn't do anything that can be dismissed as a gaming peripheral now..) is another recent example.
- _lvbh 3y agoLaptop users exist
- kalleboo 3y agoApple started talking about Performance per Watt in 2005, 18 years ago. It was their stated reason for switching from PowerPC to Intel.