2 ms·
Yes and I'd blame that on Qt more than anything else because they take C++ and bring it into their own magical world but it is very frail Borland C++ interface
by raverbashing 3y ago
Yes and I'd blame that on Qt more than anything else because they take C++ and bring it into their own magical world but it is very frail
Borland C++ interfaces for windows were better than anything else, MFC were a far 2nd place. .NET/C# made it useful again
- pjmlp 3y agoOWL and VCL for the win! Microsoft still doesn't have any tooling that comes close to C++ Builder. C++/CX was almost there, but then internal politics killed it.