4 ms·
"We need cheaper and more available power." Based on your requirements, this is already solved. Pull more oil out of the ground. Burn more trees. AND, throwin
by mynonameaccount 3y ago
"We need cheaper and more available power."
Based on your requirements, this is already solved. Pull more oil out of the ground. Burn more trees.
AND, throwing money at a problem will definitely solve fusion.
Give people cheap energy and people will use it up. Just look at cryptomining. Then you are back to needing more energy. People will do just fine with expensive energy. They will adapt.
- erik_seaberg 3y agoEvery existential problem is downstream from having dramatically more energy--carbon capture, desalination, food beyond remaining arable land and healthy soil.
- palata 3y agoOr the opposite: having dramatically less energy. Our ancestors were not destroying biodiversity, and were running on renewables :-). Our modern problems came with fossil fuels...
- erik_seaberg 3y agoThey also killed each other for land. Sometimes they starved. As for us, we’ve already emitted too much. If we merely stop it’s still going to be a bad century.
- palata 3y ago> They also killed each other for land. Sometimes they starved. If you don't, good for you. Don't think everybody has that chance. > As for us, we’ve already emitted too much. If we merely stop it’s still going to be a bad century. If we stop, it's going to be complicated times. If we don't... well we will have more conflicts for land (those that remain where humans can survive) and famines.
- shutupidiot 3y agoOur ancestors didn’t destroy biodiversity? I think the extinct mega-fauna of prehistory disagree with you. Ironically enough, their remains probably make up the gasoline in your car.
- palata 3y agoYou're right: as soon as we are able to do it, it seems like we over-exploit everything around us. Still not exactly the same scale, I would think.