3 ms·
They say privacy, but this sounds like a request to make censorship more censor friendly. Edit: People seem to disagree, but is this not a tool for wiping idea
by victor9000 3y ago
They say privacy, but this sounds like a request to make censorship more censor friendly.
Edit: People seem to disagree, but is this not a tool for wiping ideas from your training data? Meaning they want to train on Wikipedia and remove concepts (per locale probably) easy as pie. This is Google outsourcing compliance with jurisdictions that require thought policing.
- Azleur 3y agoThe obvious use case is to comply with things like copyright and data protection laws (e.g. GDPR) without having to discard all models that used data unlawfully in training. Even though they talk about removing biases from the model, I doubt this would make the model unlearn whole ideas/data patterns without severely damaging performance, which they clearly don't want.