20 ms·

No, private schools can reject students. This means voting for charter schools.

rayiner 3y ago
That’s a good thing for all the other students.
s1artibartfast 3y ago
Rejecting students is a feature not a bug. If you have a student that attacks other students or teachers institutions should be able to expel them.
- lern_too_spel 3y ago
  Then where does the rejected student go with their voucher? Segregating misbehaving students is a feature. Rejecting them is a bug.
  - deleted 3y ago
    [deleted]
  - s1artibartfast 3y ago
    to some sort of educator of last resort. This might be a private school that specialized in this, or a public school that can not refuse them and is therefore full of bad students.
    - lern_too_spel 3y ago
      And how will they get to this educator of last resort? The per child transportation and tuition costs for this educator of last resort will far exceed the amount of the voucher.
      - s1artibartfast 3y ago
        I dont see how transportation would be any different. If they can take a school bus or public trasport to school A, they could take it to school B (last resort). I don't see why the cost of an educator should be that much different at school A than B either. It might be even cheaper. California spends 23k per K-12 student now. You should be able to pay someone 100k to guard 5 jail cells with self study students.
        lern_too_spel 3y ago
        > I dont see how transportation would be any different. If they can take a school bus or public trasport to school A, they could take it to school B (last resort). Because the school of last resort will have to be further away in order to consist only of misbehaving kids. You don't have to take my word for it. You can see for yourself that there are far fewer schools for troubled kids. > I don't see why the cost of an educator should be that much different at school A than B either. Because these educators will be dealing solely with misbehaving kids. You don't have to take my word for it. There are private schools that take these kids, and they charge more.

That’s a good thing for all the other students.

Rejecting students is a feature not a bug. If you have a student that attacks other students or teachers institutions should be able to expel them.

lern_too_spel 3y ago
Then where does the rejected student go with their voucher? Segregating misbehaving students is a feature. Rejecting them is a bug.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
- s1artibartfast 3y ago
  to some sort of educator of last resort. This might be a private school that specialized in this, or a public school that can not refuse them and is therefore full of bad students.
  - lern_too_spel 3y ago
    And how will they get to this educator of last resort? The per child transportation and tuition costs for this educator of last resort will far exceed the amount of the voucher.
    - s1artibartfast 3y ago
      I dont see how transportation would be any different. If they can take a school bus or public trasport to school A, they could take it to school B (last resort). I don't see why the cost of an educator should be that much different at school A than B either. It might be even cheaper. California spends 23k per K-12 student now. You should be able to pay someone 100k to guard 5 jail cells with self study students.
      - lern_too_spel 3y ago
        > I dont see how transportation would be any different. If they can take a school bus or public trasport to school A, they could take it to school B (last resort). Because the school of last resort will have to be further away in order to consist only of misbehaving kids. You don't have to take my word for it. You can see for yourself that there are far fewer schools for troubled kids. > I don't see why the cost of an educator should be that much different at school A than B either. Because these educators will be dealing solely with misbehaving kids. You don't have to take my word for it. There are private schools that take these kids, and they charge more.