> he wasn't upfront with everything he was doing on the site like people that disclose vulnerabilities responsibly If he was, he wouldn't have really made his

> he wasn't upfront with everything he was doing on the site like people that disclose vulnerabilities responsibly If he was, he wouldn't have really made his point, would he? There are a lot of other Ruby sites which have this sort of bug. I actually do understand suspending his account, and I even kind of get the intentionally misleading communications (you have to keep the corporate customers happy, right?), but the new "white hat" policy thing is kind of silly, because that's clearly not what this was about.