This looks to be a partial version of https://dev.to/thibaultduponchelle/open-letter-to-tim-oreilly-to-free-the-perl-camel-k3i https://dev.to/thibaultduponchell

This looks to be a partial version of https://dev.to/thibaultduponchelle/open-letter-to-tim-oreilly-to-free-the-perl-camel-k3i https://dev.to/thibaultduponchelle/open-letter-to-tim-oreill... See also https://neilb.org/2020/12/04/perl-and-camels.html https://neilb.org/2020/12/04/perl-and-camels.html and https://dev.to/thibaultduponchelle/the-perl-complex-topic-of-logos-3161 https://dev.to/thibaultduponchelle/the-perl-complex-topic-of... The logo situation is a mess and I don't think it's actually anyone's fault. However, if O'Reilly could clearly assign rights to the camel for use as an official Perl logo, I think this would solve a real branding problem and make things a lot less confusing.