2 ms·
That would not be a better solution because it would entail either “solid” rules that are actually always fluctuating and/or people having prior assessments ove
by ethanbond 3y ago
That would not be a better solution because it would entail either “solid” rules that are actually always fluctuating and/or people having prior assessments overturned after the fact.
As opposed to… humans working through a specific situation for a specific solution?
- floomk 3y agoIt would at least strive for equality, instead of letting the big boys do whatever the hell they want while punishing everyone else (and making it impossible to compete). There's also the ethical concern about how apple (or their reviewer) can bully you specifically which means there is no other way to delivery our software to your users, other than complying with a bully.
- ethanbond 3y agoThe point isn’t to strive for equality, it’s to curate a healthy ecosystem. Sure, the world is rife with ethical concerns.