3 ms·
> The changes to the Twitter algorithm bulldozed over a decade’s worth of Chesterton fences in a few months. Keeping the Chesterton fences in an established or
by gary_0 3y ago
> The changes to the Twitter algorithm bulldozed over a decade’s worth of Chesterton fences in a few months.
Keeping the Chesterton fences in an established organization was something Musk was particularly ill-suited for. While some ossified companies can benefit from new management, things will only get worse if they throw the baby out with the bathwater. Musk's successes started out as greenfield projects that benefited from ignoring how the incumbents did things, but those days are over for him.
Another thing Musk was ill-suited for was being the guy that did the mass layoffs. In the earlier days of Tesla and SpaceX, most talented engineers would at least be intrigued by a job offer from Musk. He had a knack for finding brilliant people who could make his mad schemes a reality. But now he seems to embrace the darker side of his cavalier persona (while also flirting with demagoguery), which has alienated a huge portion of the talent pool that all of his companies rely on.
- bsder 3y ago> He had a knack for finding brilliant people who could make his mad schemes a reality. Musk's "knack" was coming swinging into two industries that were notorious for being both ossified and unerpaying their technical people (aerospace and automotive). He provided an outlet for underutilized smart people to flee to. Twitter, on the other hand, was sitting in the social software space. Smart people in social software were already being paid well and had lots of chocies to go to--Musk's mercurial presence could only serve as a deterrent.