I've argued before that when companies retain control of the device after the sale, that it should not be legally classified as a sale. It should be enforced a

I've argued before that when companies retain control of the device after the sale, that it should not be legally classified as a sale. It should be enforced as a rental. Either I own my property and control my property, or it's not my property. If not mine, whose is it? All we need to look is who controls it then. This is all first-sale doctrine stuff. And I don't believe any new laws need be made to enforce this.