3 ms·
I need a serious ontology ahead of these epistemological wranglings. How can I rate the app in the absence of an OS context?
by smitty1e 3y ago
I need a serious ontology ahead of these epistemological wranglings.
How can I rate the app in the absence of an OS context?
- nathan_compton 3y agoHow you you ever come up with an ontology without an epistemology?
- JumpCrisscross 3y agoGut feel and entrails?
- pessimizer 3y agoYou're disrespecting the art of haruspicy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haruspex https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haruspex
- mjburgess 3y agoHave you ever stated an epistemology without ontological commitments? How does one speak if not in terms of what exists?
- pilgrim0 3y agoSince a vocabulary already exists, then through bootstrapping.
- Der_Einzige 3y agoMore evidence for why I tell people that the Cogito was a massive mistake. You literally cannot even imagine ontology (being) without knowledge or "thought". The problem is that the appearance of thinking is not thinking. You don't actually know for sure that you are thinking. P-zombies will gladly tell you "they think therefor they are". My ontological foundation starts with my uniqueness, coming from the "creative nothing". Go read stirner or like dharmic philosophy for a non-cogitoist take on ontology.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- pilgrim0 3y agoI feel the same every time someone starts using terms without defining them. For an analogy, it’s like a page o’ code minus its dependencies. One should define the dependent terms if didactics is a concern, which in my opinion should always be. I guess this article is relativist on relativism, then?