3 ms·

If he previously said “okay” but said “ok” this time… Or sent the OK emoji… Or previously said “yes” but this time said “yup” or sent a Yes emoji… In all those

If he previously said “okay” but said “ok” this time… Or sent the OK emoji… Or previously said “yes” but this time said “yup” or sent a Yes emoji… In all those cases (and this case), I’d conclude exactly as the court did. I don’t think this was some kind of trickery being attempted by the plaintiff, but rather they made a completely reasonable conclusion that they had an accepted contract.

jeremyjh 3y ago
Yeah, this was clearly a farmer trying to back out of a contract after prices had skyrocketed and he could do better than deliver on his existing deal. There was clearly a meeting of the minds here, and that is all that is required for a contractual obligation to be enforceable.