4 ms·
Your argument would apply equally to a drunk driver who didn’t happen to crash that night. The problem is that taking pcp significantly raises the probability
by dlkf 3y ago
Your argument would apply equally to a drunk driver who didn’t happen to crash that night.
The problem is that taking pcp significantly raises the probability the user will commit an act of violence, by which point it’s too late.
- jurynulifcation 3y agoI don't believe this to be a necessary truth. Do you have any high quality studies that PCP, itself as a substance, does indeed raise the probability of someone doing something untoward? Might it not, in fact, be a problem with the people using PCP? In which case, why should it be restricted for people who would not become a nuisance? Further, why should people who do not become a problem on it have their rights taken away for the simple fact of imbibing?