4 ms·
It's obviously satirical. If so, the author is brilliant. Otherwise, well... I mean just look at the project show cases. Included are the usual colossal cluste
by netmare 3y ago
It's obviously satirical. If so, the author is brilliant. Otherwise, well...
I mean just look at the project show cases. Included are the usual colossal cluster^Wframeworks that power our decaying software infrastructure.
Personally, I don't trust anything that either stays perpetually under v1.0 or exceeds v10-15.
- jrockway 3y agoThere's no point in calling it 1.0 unless you want to break compatibility with 0.x. Sometimes you get the design right on day 1, I guess.
- Conscat 3y agoIn SemVer, you can break compatibility with 0.x within 0.x. 1.x is the promise that there won't be any future compatibility breaks within the 1.x series.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- joseluis 3y ago> exceeds v10-15 What do you think about internet browsers like Firefox and Chromium?
- netmare 3y agoI find it ridiculous that Chrome, Edge and Firefox are all currently around v115. It's just a marketing term now. I've seen Firefox and Thunderbird major version numbers change for simple bugfixes. A release date would be enough.