The follow-up to "we're never completely getting rid of single occupancy vehicles" should not be "let's put 0 occupancy vehicles on the road" which are not doin

The follow-up to "we're never completely getting rid of single occupancy vehicles" should not be "let's put 0 occupancy vehicles on the road" which are not doing any useful transportation service, but are contributing to congestion, emissions etc. Since it's pointless to come occupied vehicles (which have a person who will have a clear motive to remove the cone), the only ones being impacted are empty and _not_ carrying drunk or reckless otherwise-could-have-been-drivers.