2 ms·

> arrested for resisting arrest Oh, so all the justification the police need to strip someone of their rights (or life) is to... Say they need to be stripped o

• AnimalMuppet 3y ago
  The police have the power to strip someone of (some of) their rights. It's called arrest. Since there are people out there who won't respond to a stern glare, that power is kind of necessary. Now here's someone who resists arrest. Yes, the police have the power to use violence in that situation. What's your alternative? A stern glare?
  • shadowgovt 3y ago
    Arrest is a fine power. Resisting arrest as a crime independent of other crimes is nonsense. If they have no right to detain you, they have no right to detain you, period.
    • LawTalkingGuy 3y ago
      Ackshually, no. They have the legal power to detain you for the purposes of figuring out if they need to arrest you. If they had to have proof, and a conviction, to show that someone was guilty before detaining them they'd never be able to arrest them to take them to court and have them convicted in the first place. What you're saying is somewhat relevant to false arrest, where a police officer is acting outside his legal role. In this case though, they had a duty to remove him, even with deadly force, from the car which he'd just risked people's lives with, above and beyond their power to arrest him after removing him from the car.