4 ms·
> If "The goal isn't to replace Twitter", then what's the point, and why rush the launch, with a ton of missing features, just to take advantage of Twitter's la
by nicce 3y ago
> If "The goal isn't to replace Twitter", then what's the point, and why rush the launch, with a ton of missing features, just to take advantage of Twitter's latest problems? ("This was a lot more of a yolo launch than anything we've done in a long while
It is just a narrative to counter Twitter’s lawsuit.
https://www.npr.org/2023/07/07/1186367564/threads-meta-twitter-lawsuit https://www.npr.org/2023/07/07/1186367564/threads-meta-twitt...
- lapcat 3y ago> It is just a narrative to counter Twitter’s lawsuit. There's no lawsuit. There was a letter sent from Twitter's lawyer, and it's a complete joke. Meta has already denied that any former Twitter employees worked on Threads.
- nicce 3y ago> There's no lawsuit. There was a letter sent from Twitter's lawyer, and it's a complete joke. Meta has already denied that any former Twitter employees worked on Threads. You can also counter lawsuit by preventing it to happen. (Letter was threat) And it does not matter what Meta says. If someone wants to sue, court it is. And it would be interesting case, since they are quite identical apps.
- lapcat 3y ago> It is just a narrative to counter Twitter’s lawsuit. > And it does not matter what Meta says. If someone wants to sue, court it is. You just contradicted yourself.
- nicce 3y ago… You are either implying that either it is impossible to influence things by saying things or that countering cannot also happen beforhand if the lawsuit happens (while also helps in preventing that). Why people argue about everything.