3 ms·
I don't understand what you mean by what you've written. What is "active consent"? What, here, is described by that term? A few people has said "WE don't conse
by lo_zamoyski 3y ago
I don't understand what you mean by what you've written. What is "active consent"? What, here, is described by that term?
A few people has said "WE don't consent". That's the first issue: a few people think they have the authority to speak for everyone. Is that your definition of "active consent", the commandeering of society by a few self-appointed authorities? Sorry to break it to you, but that's exactly the opposite of the rule of law. That is the tyranny of an aggressive minority.
The second issue is that mob rule is an absolutely terrible way to govern, which doesn't apply here. We have representatives for a reason. Direct democracy is tyranny of the mob, and mob rule, too, is the opposite of rule of law.
Also, re: the tweet, I cannot take seriously anyone who uses words like "un-alived". It's clownish newspeak.