4 ms·
> But this mostly applies to JS which has a kickass implementation of async/await. The fact that JS simply has no other options for doing anything concurrently
by usrbinbash 3y ago
> But this mostly applies to JS which has a kickass implementation of async/await.
The fact that JS simply has no other options for doing anything concurrently, might have something to do with that.
- mschuetz 3y agoHuh? It had other options longer than it had async/await. Async/await is a fairly recent addition. E.g. before fetch with async/await, there was XmlHTTPRequest with callbacks. It also had Web Workers as a means for parallel&concurrent processing for way longer than it had async/await.