>You humored and addressed the premise when you asked "Why not?" No, I did not "humor and address [a] premise" because, again, that's not what OP did. In both

>You humored and addressed the premise when you asked "Why not?" No, I did not "humor and address [a] premise" because, again, that's not what OP did. In both comments, OP asserts that this is a feminist translation that should not be taken as a serious work. I asked OP, "Why not?" because I read the piece and disagreed with that assertion - I wanted to know, explicitly, if they were able to explain what about it they felt made it not "a serious work" and why "it shouldn't be taken as such". I wanted OP to defend their assertion made about this specific piece, and to elaborate on their perspective. Because of that, I would imagine that it'd be clear to most people how your initial comment could've been read as arguing that this translation seems absurd, even if that's not where you were coming from. If you think I'm wrong in reading OP's comments as an assertion rather than a premise, just look at how many other people responded in a way that suggests that they read it the same way I did. >Otherwise this conversation has taken an unproductive turn... Really? I genuinely thought that identifying where our disconnect occurred was productive. >I'm not amused by your attempt to rug-pull me. That's... not at all what I'm doing. All I've done was clarify our misunderstanding of one another, and your misunderstanding of OP's comments. It's OK to have accidentally misunderstood what someone was saying, there's no need to get personal here. I hope you have a nice weekend.