3 ms·

> Content writing and concept artists come to mind, I've heard commercial art is getting decimated. Who? Be specific. This displacement is happening rapidly, i

> Content writing and concept artists come to mind, I've heard commercial art is getting decimated. Who? Be specific. This displacement is happening rapidly, it should be easy to point out. > The trucking industry is dumping tons of $$$ into automated AI trucking. Tech companies are experimenting with drone delivery instead of hiring drivers. Rideshares experimenting with self-driving taxis. The list goes on. How many truck drivers have been laid off from this technology which hasn't been deployed widely / left the experimentation phase? > she uses ChatGPT to generate marketing copy instead of hiring content writers. So far the only real competition you've mentioned. And yeah, language models are good at writing low value language. I have yet to hear about mass unemployment of content writers however. These are people who will upskill/shift into other marketing roles easily. > Someone else I know uses AI to SEOize very technical text to something search engines like at like 10x the rate he used to do by hand. And this is a bad thing? > As a solo and formerly senior SWE, ChatGPT is like having a junior developer on call to do my research and get me preliminary results. You say this as if companies will stop hiring juniors. They won't. The world will simply write more code with more productive people. > You're sticking your head in your sand if you think it isn't coming. The same has been said during every technological shift. Mechanization will result in mass unemployment of laborers. Email will result in mass unemployment of mail carriers. Through many cycles of technology, the human race has never allowed slack in the workforce to go unused for very long. We could have stopped at the steam engine and accepted the quality of life we had, instead of repurposing displaced workers and marching forward. This won't change until we have true AGI which we are nowhere near.

pdntspa 3y ago
> Who? Be specific. This displacement is happening rapidly, it should be easy to point out. I just freakin said who. That is very specific. What are you looking for me to name Jessica, former content lead at AcmeCorp? > How many truck drivers have been laid off from this technology which hasn't been deployed widely / left the experimentation phase? None, yet. But you are missing my point. This stuff is beginning to happen. Much has yet to happen. You are betting that it won't happen, and I am saying you are wrong. Very little of this will empower people where they are, at the lowest rungs of various corporate ladders. But it will empower their taskmasters, who will happily shed them with the same bullshit excuses they've always given: "Not my problem" and "Sorry, it's just business." Since you're so damn optimistic about the future, what are these jobs that these people will be retraining to? That don't exist yet. Please share just a little bit of your visionary insight.
- qeternity 3y ago
  > I just freakin said who. That is very specific. What are you looking for me to name Jessica, former content lead at AcmeCorp? How about a company or an article? > But you are missing my point. This stuff is beginning to happen. I'm not, you're missing mine. You believe they are beginning to happen. But you tell me they haven't happened yet. There is nothing substantive to justify this fear. History certainly doesn't. That's my point. > Since you're so damn optimistic about the future, what are these jobs that these people will be retraining to? That don't exist yet. Imagine that, the future creating new jobs for people. Not as if that has ever happened before. We're all still toiling in the fields aren't we.
leshow 3y ago
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/02/ai-taking-jobs/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/02/ai-taki... AI will take some jobs, but there is another risk. It's far more likely that they "de-skill" a certain aspect of work so it becomes less creative and more mundane, more easily replaceable. The goal is to turn creative work into something like a position on an assembly line. The problem isn't technology, it's in who it benefits. Productivity gains could benefit everyone. We could all get more time off, for example. Instead, those gains make a small number of people extremely wealthy and everyone else more miserable.
- qeternity 3y ago
  > We could all get more time off, for example. The average person active on HN could do this. They could move somewhere with extremely low cost of living and work a remote job. But almost nobody does this. Instead people choose to live in incredibly high cost areas at well paid jobs, chasing ever higher quality of life. It's not some boogeyman forcing this. It's just human nature.

pdntspa 3y ago

> Who? Be specific. This displacement is happening rapidly, it should be easy to point out. I just freakin said who. That is very specific. What are you looking for me to name Jessica, former content lead at AcmeCorp? > How many truck drivers have been laid off from this technology which hasn't been deployed widely / left the experimentation phase? None, yet. But you are missing my point. This stuff is beginning to happen. Much has yet to happen. You are betting that it won't happen, and I am saying you are wrong. Very little of this will empower people where they are, at the lowest rungs of various corporate ladders. But it will empower their taskmasters, who will happily shed them with the same bullshit excuses they've always given: "Not my problem" and "Sorry, it's just business." Since you're so damn optimistic about the future, what are these jobs that these people will be retraining to? That don't exist yet. Please share just a little bit of your visionary insight.

qeternity 3y ago
> I just freakin said who. That is very specific. What are you looking for me to name Jessica, former content lead at AcmeCorp? How about a company or an article? > But you are missing my point. This stuff is beginning to happen. I'm not, you're missing mine. You believe they are beginning to happen. But you tell me they haven't happened yet. There is nothing substantive to justify this fear. History certainly doesn't. That's my point. > Since you're so damn optimistic about the future, what are these jobs that these people will be retraining to? That don't exist yet. Imagine that, the future creating new jobs for people. Not as if that has ever happened before. We're all still toiling in the fields aren't we.

leshow 3y ago

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/02/ai-taking-jobs/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/06/02/ai-taki... AI will take some jobs, but there is another risk. It's far more likely that they "de-skill" a certain aspect of work so it becomes less creative and more mundane, more easily replaceable. The goal is to turn creative work into something like a position on an assembly line. The problem isn't technology, it's in who it benefits. Productivity gains could benefit everyone. We could all get more time off, for example. Instead, those gains make a small number of people extremely wealthy and everyone else more miserable.

qeternity 3y ago
> We could all get more time off, for example. The average person active on HN could do this. They could move somewhere with extremely low cost of living and work a remote job. But almost nobody does this. Instead people choose to live in incredibly high cost areas at well paid jobs, chasing ever higher quality of life. It's not some boogeyman forcing this. It's just human nature.