Reading the case[1], there's relevant background specific to the circumstances. The judge notes the two parties had demonstrated a long history of executing co

Reading the case[1], there's relevant background specific to the circumstances. The judge notes the two parties had demonstrated a long history of executing contracts and doing business in this manner. Most of the other comments here (at least at the moment) seem to have missed this nuance. The earlier HN post linked by OP mgbmtl has more interesting discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36618977 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36618977 [1] https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skkb/doc/2023/2023skkb116/2023skkb116.html https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/skkb/doc/2023/2023skkb116/2023s...