4 ms·
In addition, this kind of thinking will attrit some of those 5% of users, so repeated application will shrink their market share even further. it's the excel pr
by rcxdude 3y ago
In addition, this kind of thinking will attrit some of those 5% of users, so repeated application will shrink their market share even further. it's the excel problem: a huge number of features will only be used by a minority of users, but a majority of users use at least one of those features.
- charcircuit 3y agoWith that logic you could say that 95% of users could keep leaving because you keep focusing on the minority use cases. Would you rather attrite a fraction of 95% of your users or a fraction of 5% of your users.
- rcxdude 3y agosee the second half of my comment. You may lose 5% of your users with one particular removal, but if you keep doing it you'll lose most of them.
- charcircuit 3y agoDid you read my comment? If we had to remove one of two features and one of them was used by 5% of users and one of them was used by 95% of users wouldn't you like to know which one is which? Without data you can invest your time into the wrong features.
- rcxdude 3y agoor, you could not remove features
- charcircuit 3y agoYou were the one that brought up removing features.