3 ms·
Yeah not my thing either, I'd rather see a cheatsheet and a few examples lol
by gosukiwi 3y ago
Yeah not my thing either, I'd rather see a cheatsheet and a few examples lol
- anyfoo 3y agoYou can't learn a programming language like that, unless it already has very similar paradigms to languages you already know. For example, try to learn APL[1] or Haskell like that (or just assembly if you haven't done any kind of assembly yet). [1] And that's not just because of the arcane symbols.
- marginalia_nu 3y agoI think assembly is probably the one language family you'd find most success learning from a reference sheet.
- anyfoo 3y agoOnce you've been told what a register, a stack, and an addressing mode is (among other details), sure. But then you do know the paradigms already. But of the languages I mentioned, assembly is certainly the one where the required concepts can be explained quickest, probably by far...
- Cerium 3y agoYeah, sure - as long as that reference sheet is the CPU reference manual.