3 ms·
Except we were talking specifically about Poland for which you said you support what they do. Now that you know the facts do you still support prolonging the us
by locallost 3y ago
Except we were talking specifically about Poland for which you said you support what they do. Now that you know the facts do you still support prolonging the use of so much coal? In 4 years they've done nothing, and won't do anything for at least a decade. Germany's coal exit 2030 you called too slow. Will you reconsider?
France started building a prototype replacement in Flamanville for those reactors and with a bit of luck it might be finished this year. After 20 years of development.
- fsflover 3y agoPoland must change the regulation, not give up on fighting climate change. Even trying and failing is better than not trying at all, as you suggest. The French prototypes are now ready and tested. Why not use them?
- locallost 3y agoWhich regulation? They gave up on climate change when they decided to invest in nuclear energy. They prioritized nuclear power over removal of coal. If the whole world takes this viewpoint we will decarbonize in a few centuries. The French plants were designed to run for 30 years, their replacement was supposed to be the EPR and the construction on Flamanville started almost 20 years ago. The program has been a colossal failure. The problem is you don't know anything.
- fsflover 3y agoRemoval of coal? Show me any reliable, scalable, affordable method.