6 ms·
I've got a few. They're not quite as nice as 'proper' books, but the reduction in having to transport and store books before they're sold, and the fact that it
by onion2k 3y ago
I've got a few. They're not quite as nice as 'proper' books, but the reduction in having to transport and store books before they're sold, and the fact that it means Amazon can have a much bigger inventory, means I'm fine with them. I can deal with having a lower quality book if it means I can get the book I want.
The only real downside is that I'm very reluctant to buy someone else a book as a gift from Amazon. I'll go to a book store in that situation.
- icoder 3y agoIf you extrapolate those criteria further; less nice, less transport and storage and more inventory you end up with e-books. But I absolutely understand that your personal preference is somewhere in the middle (while mine is at the end).
- bowsamic 3y agoThere are many kinds of books that are very difficult to read as ebooks
- globular-toast 3y agoAlmost every book I read nowadays that isn't a textbook is read on my Kobo. (Is there a word for that kind of book? The type you read through once from beginning to end.) But for textbooks and other reference materials, a paper book (or just stapled papers) is by far the best technology available. The speed of information retrieval is unparalleled, especially once you become familiar with the layout. Flipping backwards and forwards between pages and thumbing to the correct place by memory is common. Not to mention that you have as much "screen" space as desk space, and you can even pile them on top of each other if that's not enough.