4 ms·
I'm not exactly sure I trust EU either tbf. They haven't really shown themselves to be good stewards of understanding how internet works with their previous res
by lannisterstark 3y ago
I'm not exactly sure I trust EU either tbf. They haven't really shown themselves to be good stewards of understanding how internet works with their previous resolutions.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ranguna 3y agoLeast worse option probably.
- lannisterstark 3y agoidk about 'least worse.' Better than US, probably, but EU and US aren't the only two places in the world.
- hardware2win 3y agoe.g?
- lannisterstark 3y ago>Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC >Digital Services Act
- viraptor 3y ago> with their previous resolutions. That's so vague it can apply to anything in any country... Wanna add specific examples?
- lannisterstark 3y agotwo: Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC Digital Services Act
- jkaplowitz 3y agoI can say the same about the US though, and at least the EU gives hundreds of millions of people far more rights in relation to their data than anything available in the US; a few US states like California give a limited form of this, but by far not most. So, while you’re right that the EU and the US both have flaws in this area, this move is still an improvement.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- pgeorgi 3y agoThe type of trust is very different though: the EU didn't get a bit if data about you out of its regulation.
- ilyt 3y agoNone of the governments did; but GDPR is step in right direction compared to... whatever the fuck US is doing.
- lannisterstark 3y ago>whatever the fuck US is doing. -20 is better than -30 but still far below 0. That's why I said "EU either."