11 ms·
> Journalists are taking quotes out of context, inject all manner of spin for various pre existiing PoV's. The RNZ article quotes science educators very strong
by nyokodo 3y ago
> Journalists are taking quotes out of context, inject all manner of spin for various pre existiing PoV's.
The RNZ article quotes science educators very strongly criticizing the draft. That’s the only pre-existing PV that matters.
> The core material is a DRAFT outlining notions of breaking down pure silos in favor of broader intergrated approaches in PRIMARY school education.
Drafts ought to approximate a final draft and apparently science educators are appalled at this draft. Rarely are drafts totally rewritten as they represent what the administration is pushing. That’s alarming given the criticism.
- defrost 3y agoIt's not a published draft, it's leaked portions of an unfinished work. It's being treated as though the parts leaked are the complete near polished position rather than notions for comment about better integrated STEM approaches Vs more rigid pasr siloed approaches.