3 ms·
> we might wish OCB hadn’t been patented Rogaway says he has released all his OCB patents into the public domain[1], so it sounds like OCB might be an option f
by mananaysiempre 3y ago
> we might wish OCB hadn’t been patented
Rogaway says he has released all his OCB patents into the public domain[1], so it sounds like OCB might be an option for greenfield projects? OTOH, I don’t see why you’d use any kind of AES in a greenfield project outside the surreal FIPS world, given how absolutely miserable constant-time software for it is. (ChaCha is kind of miserable when you don’t have at least a 32-bit ALU with a barrel shifter—that is on exactly the kind of platforms where table-based AES might actually be constant-time—but I’m not sure that’s a good enough reason.)
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/qLTveWOdTJcLn4HP3ev-vrj05Vg/ https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/qLTveWOdTJcLn4HP3...
- tptacek 3y agoIt is now, but when all this stuff was getting nailed down and all the standards were being written and all the AEAD libraries were being implemented it was off the table, so a lot of people feel like rehabilitating OCB isn't a great hill to die on.