3 ms·
I totally get that, but XAES-256-GCM/11 is in an even worse situation than XChachaPoly since none are NIST but XChachaPoly has at least a RFC ^^ EDIT: I'm wron
by forty 3y ago
I totally get that, but XAES-256-GCM/11 is in an even worse situation than XChachaPoly since none are NIST but XChachaPoly has at least a RFC ^^
EDIT: I'm wrong, ChachaPoly has an rfc, but not the X variant
- commandersaki 3y agoXChaCha20Poly1305 does have an RFC authored by Scott Arciszewski: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-arciszewski-xchacha-03 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-arciszewski-xcha...
- forty 3y agoYes but it has been expired for a while