I disagree. 1) Garbage replaced with garbage is still garbage. 2) spam replaced with spam is still spam. 3) artisanal writing will always be higher quality a

I disagree. 1) Garbage replaced with garbage is still garbage. 2) spam replaced with spam is still spam. 3) artisanal writing will always be higher quality and demand higher premiums, viewership, margins, and stickiness. 4) generative AI can be used by humans to craft reasonable boilerplate and edited by humans to add value and depth. Similarly calculators can produce mathematical results but they’re only interesting the context of a humans agency and synthesis. The use of generative AI for writing is more like using a code completer or calculator and at no stage removes a human - the AI must be prompted and guided, and as is shown in the article must be edited and post processed to be appealing. The machine covers only a small part of the exercise. Unless you’re making garbage or spam, in which case see (1),(2)