> Speech does not censor speech We know from the Twitter document dumps that government officials on both sides of the aisle have been demanding that speech (a

> Speech does not censor speech We know from the Twitter document dumps that government officials on both sides of the aisle have been demanding that speech (and speakers) critical of them, their preferred policies and/or their political party be censored. > intimidation requires an actual threat Threatening to yank section 230 of the Communications Decency Act if platforms don't ramp up their censorship is an actual threat. > You may have never heard of it, but Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is the legal backbone of the internet. The law was created almost 30 years ago to protect internet platforms from liability for many of the things third parties say or do on them. Decades later, it’s never been more controversial. People from both political parties and all three branches of government have threatened to reform or even repeal it. https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/28/21273241/section-230-explained-supreme-court-social-media https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/28/21273241/section-230-ex...