3 ms·
The court clearly found that wrongly because they do say that there are other non first amendment protected speech that the government can indeed suppress on so
by rhaway84773 3y ago
The court clearly found that wrongly because they do say that there are other non first amendment protected speech that the government can indeed suppress on social media.
It’s just these few non first amendment protected items that the court is ideologically opposed to that the government cannot suppress.
- curiousllama 3y ago> there are other non first amendment protected speech that the government can indeed suppress This is a famously narrow category (eg CSAM). The gov often can't even suppress state secrets. I think most people are fine with this category existing, even if there's disagreements on what's in it.