> mind expanding on this part? Certainly. That part is a sentence written to be short and catchy. It sacrifices precision for reasons of brevity and style. It

> mind expanding on this part? Certainly. That part is a sentence written to be short and catchy. It sacrifices precision for reasons of brevity and style. It also doesnt mention either concurrency or parallelism, it just uses the word "parallel". This is acceptable, because the post goes on to more precise statements later on, quote: It works for both i/o bound concurrency and cpu bound parallel computing. End Quote.