3 ms·
I did not see such a limitation in the ruling (although I admit to just scanning it). Instead the ruling seemed to focus on the distinction between the permissi
by HWR_14 3y ago
I did not see such a limitation in the ruling (although I admit to just scanning it). Instead the ruling seemed to focus on the distinction between the permissibility of recording police officers versus other government officials.
- lotsofpulp 3y agoBased on the page 5 and 6 description of Oregon statute 165.540(1)(c), loteck’s conclusion seems correct to me. Page 43 is the conclusion where the statute is reversed and remanded.