Yeah, guilty of not reading article detail, was assuming their net was landmark, and no, not assuming revenue is impacted by reduced expense. Also assumed pay f

Yeah, guilty of not reading article detail, was assuming their net was landmark, and no, not assuming revenue is impacted by reduced expense. Also assumed pay freeze was presently in effect, meaning immediate cost avoidance and predictable expense though term of policy. Either way, I have some sympathy for the business interest and would be as interested in the internal rationale, at least as much as the reactionary injustice take/assumption.