> I disbelieve that this is the case, for copyrighted material; The blog post provides this link to section 107 of the US Copyright code: https://www.law.corne

> I disbelieve that this is the case, for copyrighted material; The blog post provides this link to section 107 of the US Copyright code: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107 And, in the text of the statute is the following: > Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. The above was also quoted by the blog itself. The actual statute says "the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords ... for purposes such as ... teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use) ... is not an infringement of copyright.". So the statute explicitly details that the statement by the GP is correct. That making multiple (meaning more than one, 30 being more than one) copies for classroom use for the purpose of teaching is actually "not an infringement of copyright".