4 ms·
Ish. It’s usually more useful to test hypotheses about why something is. If that something isn’t then you can’t get an answer & will often demonstrate the count
by photonerd 3y ago
Ish. It’s usually more useful to test hypotheses about why something is. If that something isn’t then you can’t get an answer & will often demonstrate the counter-factual.
Simple “we confirmed water is wet” tests are not very good science. Whereas “what is wetness & why does it happen” is.