3 ms·
> The conclusion was self-evident before they ran the experiment, so another criticism that could be leveled at the experiment was that it was redundant. "It's
by scubbo 3y ago
> The conclusion was self-evident before they ran the experiment, so another criticism that could be leveled at the experiment was that it was redundant.
"It's just common sense" is not a solid scientific proof. Testing something that we _think_ we know (but have no proven) is not a bad thing.
- photonerd 3y agoIsh. It’s usually more useful to test hypotheses about why something is. If that something isn’t then you can’t get an answer & will often demonstrate the counter-factual. Simple “we confirmed water is wet” tests are not very good science. Whereas “what is wetness & why does it happen” is.