> that's victim blaming No, it's not. Victim blaming refers to the victims of crime being accused of being at fault for what someone did to them, often but not

> that's victim blaming No, it's not. Victim blaming refers to the victims of crime being accused of being at fault for what someone did to them, often but not always because they are part of a societal outgroup. > The whole sales pitch of GPT-4 is a do-what-I-mean interface, and it clearly did not do what they meant, or what any reasonable hacker would expect them to mean. It's clearly marked as experimental, people are repeatedly told not to rely on it (ie when they login each time, and often by the ai itself), and there have now been a year+ of very public examples of various AIs getting things hilariously wrong. From the login warning: > While we have safeguards in place, the system may occasionally generate incorrect or misleading information and produce offensive or biased content. It is not intended to give advice. Any "reasonable hacker" would extrapolate from that, that giving it access to an API could lead it to do unexpected things. Any "reasonable hacker" would contain it within a sandboxed project. Etc etc.