Honestly, I really think Gerrit would be so much better if it weren't for the UI being so... compact? I think it's actually got good information, and a review t

Honestly, I really think Gerrit would be so much better if it weren't for the UI being so... compact? I think it's actually got good information, and a review tool is something many people spend tons of time in, so power-user proficiency is important. But the density is wrong, and I feel it makes it more cluttered than necessary, and that drives people away? Here's a good example of what I mean, taking a change from ChromiumOS's Gerrit versus a random patch on Phorge (a fork of Phabricator which uses a similar workflow): - https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/kernel/+/4228112 https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_... - https://we.phorge.it/D25332 https://we.phorge.it/D25332 The Gerrit one is really busy in my opinion, while the Phorge one gives the page a lot more breathing room, which I think just makes viewing it much easier and less intimidating. Despite that Phorge is still good for power users: it shows all the needed information, has hotkey shortcuts for fast navigation, nice diff viewer, nice side panel with all diffs listed, etc. I'm trying to set up Gerrit right now and the really compact UI is honestly my main complaint. Maybe someone who's better at UI/UX can give more refined comparison or analysis, but the nice, "bigger" design of Phabricator/Phorge's diff viewer is something I really miss. (I also like the "untabbed" design of Phorge, contra GitHub; all the comments, changes, and code is on one page, instead of having to click back and forth between comments and diffs.)