You're not wrong about the javascript, but that doesn't make you right about the https. This enforcement is ridiculous. I've wondered if I had chance at a law

You're not wrong about the javascript, but that doesn't make you right about the https. This enforcement is ridiculous. I've wondered if I had chance at a law suite against goggle (and their lapdogs at mozzila foundation) for calling some of my domains "illegitimate" because I use self-signed certs. Just because I didn't pay twate, or get my cert from someone else who paid twate, doesn't mean my site is "illegitimate". Luckily for me, I'm not trying to launch the next twitverse. I use those domains for my own work, they're not out there to be popular. The article never delves into the world of small network attached devices, some of which are in use long long after their manufactures have been purchased and shut down by the same asshole trying to make you throw it out because it's encryption algorithms are too old, or, Oh No!!!, it uses http for it's webinterface. In the end, https only is goggle power play propped up by fanboi-ism...