4 ms·
It's probably better to read it front to back because CLTL2 isn't 1994 standard Common Lisp.
by tmtvl 3y ago
It's probably better to read it front to back because CLTL2 isn't 1994 standard Common Lisp.
- kagevf 3y agoRight, CLTL2 doesn't conform to the ansi spec. I just wonder if it's common to read all the way through, or as a reference in addition to CLHS, to maybe get some additional perspective on why a feature is a certain way, etc ...