Glad the author demanded article removed rather than heavily censored and keeping his byline. I haven't read the original article, but by the sounds of it it w

Glad the author demanded article removed rather than heavily censored and keeping his byline. I haven't read the original article, but by the sounds of it it was pretty personal and took the option of describing what "others" have said to attack the CEO. Breaking even in terms of journalistic integrity in my judgement.